VibeMathedMath problems solved by AI
All problems

1.28249... Lower Bound and Partial Upper Bounds for Cost-Preserving Single-Source Unsplittable Flows

For a single-source unsplittable flow, find the optimal universal additive constant CC s.t. every feasible fractional flow xx with arc costs cc should admit an unsplittable routing yy with cycxc^\top y \le c^\top x and yaxa+Cdmaxy_a \le x_a + C \cdot d_{\max} on every arc. Goemans conjectured C=1C=1; this was disproved in July 2026 by a separate seven-vertex counterexample with critical constant 16/1516/15 (see the Dinitz–Garg–Goemans entry), leaving the optimal CC open. Lower bound: we present a seventeen-terminal common-point interval instance that certifies C  12824947979848435211018=1.28249 C\ \ge\ \frac{1282494797984843521}{10^{18}}=1.28249\ldots Upper bounds: we prove the first unconditional upper bound below 2 for a nontrivial family of extremal cells, representing the class as a weighted two-permutation prefix system. We also prove additional structural results on the limits of techniques used for the lower bound. The ceilings apply to the common-point / two-order class from which the lower bounds are drawn, not to the universal constant CC itself.

Result
Proved (Record lower bound plus class-restricted ceilings; the existence and exact value of a finite universal constant remain open)
Status
Partial result
AI contribution
AI co-developed
Method
Construction
Field
Combinatorics
Posed by
Dinitz, Garg, Goemans
Year posed
1999
Years open
27y
Solved
2026-07-31
Model
GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5
Vendor
OpenAI, Anthropic
Collaborators
Sergey Nikolenko
Verification
Site-confirmed
Publication
Preprint
Significance
15 / 100
Disclosed cost
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What the AI did

GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 5 carried out the search for constructions, symbolic envelope derivations, proofs, and the exact-verifier development; the human author framed the program, directed the search, set the claim scope, and verified all results independently by hand.

Verification

The k=17 lower bound is a finite certificate: the verifier rebuilds the 67-arc instance from raw interval data, rediscovers all paths by DFS, and enumerates all 2^17 routings in exact rational arithmetic. Re-run by the site from a clean clone on 2026-08-01; the exact constant, 15 minimizers, and 18-atom hull certificate reproduce. The deletion-star ceiling theorems are conventional proofs in an unreviewed preprint, checked by the author only — no independent expert review, no formalization. Tier reflects the site's confirmation of the certificate; the structural results remain unreviewed.

Sources

Unsplittable flows repository

Submitted by BraveDingo215

Changelog14 changes
  • Rasmus Lindahlcommented
  • BraveDingo215commented
  • Rasmus Lindahlset Significance to 15
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Result from disproved to proved
  • Rasmus Lindahlcommented
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged More links from Zenodo preprint | https://zenodo.org/records/21716713 to Zenodo preprint | https://zenodo.org/records/21716713, Paper I's Zenodo record | https://z…
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Model from GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Statement from For a single-source unsplittable flow, find the optimal universal additive constant $C$ s.… to For a single-source unsplittable flow, find the optimal universal additive constant $C$ s.…
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Solve date from 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31
  • Rasmus Lindahlset Vendor to OpenAI, Anthropic
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Verification note from Every numerical claim is certified in exact rational or symbolic arithmetic by programs th… to The k=17 lower bound is a finite certificate: the verifier rebuilds the 67-arc instance fr…
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Verification from expert-verified to site-confirmed
  • Rasmus Lindahlapproved this entry
  • BraveDingo215submitted this entry

Discussion3

Rasmus Lindahl01 Aug 2026· edited

Feel free to discuss any entry values that might be wrong here. Also thank you for the submission :)

BraveDingo21501 Aug 2026· edited

Thanks for the quick turnaround! Just wanted to add what I forgot to mention in the description: the limit for this class of examples is 43\tfrac 43 as the number of terminals in the graph goes to \infty. So with a huge computation, we could probably get to 43ϵ\tfrac 43 - \epsilon; 1.28249...1.28249... is a specific graph with 1717 terminals.

Rasmus Lindahl01 Aug 2026

Thanks, that's really useful context! So 1.28249 and so on is just where the explicit k=17 certificate lands, and the family should approach 4/3 as the number of terminals grows. Is the 4/3 limit established somewhere in the preprint (I could only find the 3/2 ceiling for the class), or is it numerical/expected for now? Happy to add it to the entry either way, I just want to label it correctly as proved versus conjectured. And if you ever certify a larger instance, the entry can track the new record constant.