VibeMathedMath problems solved by AI

Han's Conjecture

For a finite-dimensional algebra AA, finite global dimension forces HHn(A)=0\mathrm{HH}_n(A) = 0 for all large nn. Han conjectured the converse: eventual vanishing of Hochschild homology should detect homological smoothness. Disproved by an explicit finite-dimensional C\mathbb{C}-algebra with HHn(A)=0\mathrm{HH}_n(A) = 0 for every n1n \geq 1 and gldimA=\mathrm{gldim}\, A = \infty, built by transporting Krah's phantom into a singularity category via one-periodic folding.

Result
Disproved(see note)
Status
Resolved
AI contribution
AI co-developed
Method
Construction
Field
Homological algebra
Posed by
Yang Han
Year posed
2006
Years open
20y
Solved
2026-07-31
Model
GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
Bochao Kong, Yeqin Liu, Yu Shen
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Preprint
Significance
25 / 100
Disclosed cost
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

The counterexample is an ordinary algebra concentrated in degree zero, with the strongest possible vanishing in positive degrees, so the phenomenon needs no grading or differential. Liu and Shen had already disproved the differential-graded version in December 2025 without any AI involvement; the classical case is the one that fell with a model in the loop.

What the AI did

The paper's acknowledgment in full: "The counterexample presented in this paper was discovered with the assistance of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra model. All mathematical arguments and references were independently verified by the authors." In a counterexample paper the algebra is the whole result, so crediting the model with its discovery is a claim about the central object, not about support work. The hedge "with the assistance of" keeps this below the top tier.

Verification

A preprint days old with no independent review. The surrounding evidence is unusually strong for something this new: two of the three authors disproved the differential-graded analogue of the same conjecture in December 2025, this paper extends that program, and the construction runs on named recent machinery (Krah's phantom from Inventiones 2024, Chen's partial-resolution theorem, the Wang-Arunachalam-Keller identification) rather than novel unpublished tools. That is provenance, not verification, and the tier reflects the difference.

Sources

arXiv

Submitted by FrostyBadger576 on

Changelog2 changes
  • Rasmus Lindahlapproved this entry
  • FrostyBadger576submitted this entry

Discussion