The Zilber-Pink conjecture for abelian varieties over number fields
Let be an abelian variety over a number field and an irreducible subvariety, and let be the smallest torsion coset containing . A component of , for a torsion coset , is atypical if . Zilber (2002, for semiabelian varieties) and Pink (2005) conjectured that such unlikely intersections are controlled, generalizing Manin-Mumford and Mordell-Lang. The curve case was proved by Habegger and Pila (2016); higher dimensions were known only under extra quotient-dimension or height conditions or in codimension one or two. Does every such have only finitely many maximal atypical subvarieties?
- Result
- Proved(see note)
- Status
- Partial result
- AI contribution
- AI-discovered
- Method
- Argument
- Field
- Diophantine geometry; unlikely intersections
- Posed by
- Boris Zilber (J. London Math. Soc., 2002) and Richard Pink (ETH preprint, 2005, Conjecture 5.1 for semiabelian varieties)
- Year posed
- 2002
- Years open
- 24y
- Solved
- 2026-09-24
- Model
- Unreleased internal OpenAI model
- Vendor
- OpenAI
- Collaborators
- —
- Verification
- Unreviewed
- Publication
- Announced
- Collection
- OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
- Significance
- 58 / 100
- Disclosed cost
- —
- Wikipedia
- No dedicated article
What was actually shown
Claims that for any abelian variety over a number field, every irreducible subvariety has only finitely many maximal atypical subvarieties inside its smallest containing torsion coset, via a non-density theorem for for in no proper torsion coset. A corollary gives the abelian algebraic-point case of Pink's Conjecture 5.2 for finite-rank translates. It does NOT treat semiabelian varieties, abelian varieties over not defined over , or Shimura varieties, and gives no effective or uniform bound.
What the AI did
The release README says the manuscripts were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model, the vast majority by one fixed procedure using on average about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result, and that some outputs build on earlier results produced by the models. Its named exceptions to that procedure (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties and the zeta zero-free region work) do not concern this family. The manuscript is credited to OpenAI with no human author named.
Verification
No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Theorem 1.1 was read against the posed conjecture: for every abelian variety over a number field and every irreducible subvariety, finitely many maximal atypical subvarieties relative to the smallest containing torsion coset, with no simplicity, CM or height hypothesis. It is the abelian case over of Zilber-Pink, not the semiabelian, complex-field or Shimura cases. The reduction to a non-density theorem uses Barroero and Dill's optimal-subvariety argument as a cited input; the height part builds on Vojta, Faltings, Remond and Dill. No Lean formalization. The finiteness is not effective.
Sources
- PaperFamily companion: Elliptic squares and Zilber-Pink for curves in A2 (separate entry)
- CodeOpenAI math release: The abelian Zilber-Pink conjecture
- Problem recordPink (2005), A common generalization of the conjectures of Andre-Oort, Manin-Mumford, and Mordell-LangZilber (2002), Exponential sums equations and the Schanuel conjecture