An Explicit Counterexample to the Rank-Two Poisson Conjecture
Let carry the canonical Poisson bracket determined by and by the vanishing of the other brackets between distinct generators. Here and throughout, “rank two” means two canonical pairs in the standard indexing of the canonical Poisson algebras; thus there are four polynomial generators and the Poisson tensor has geometric rank four. We give explicit polynomials satisfying while . Consequently, the assignment defines a Poisson endomorphism of that is not an automorphism. This disproves the Poisson Conjecture for two canonical pairs, and hence for every number of canonical pairs at least two.
- Result
- Disproved(see note)
- Status
- Resolved
- AI contribution
- AI-discovered
- Method
- Construction
- Field
- Poisson algebra
- Posed by
- —
- Year posed
- —
- Years open
- —
- Solved
- 2026-07-22
- Model
- ChatGPT 5.6 Sol; Claude Fable 5
- Vendor
- OpenAI; Anthropic
- Collaborators
- Christopher D. Long
- Verification
- Unreviewed
- Publication
- Preprint
- Significance
- 35 / 100
- Disclosed cost
- —
- Wikipedia
- 4 languages
What was actually shown
The paper constructs explicit defining a Poisson endomorphism of the canonical rank-two Poisson algebra that is not an automorphism. Its associated polynomial map preserves the canonical symplectic form, has Jacobian determinant , and has an explicit fiber of exactly three points. Thus is false, and stabilization gives failure of for every . An appendix further constructs an explicit nonautomorphic endomorphism of the fourth Weyl algebra, proving false.
What the AI did
The four-variable rank-two Poisson construction, including its Hamiltonian correction, was produced during an interactive research session with ChatGPT 5.6 Sol. The model also assisted with organizing the differential-form proof, exact symbolic verification, literature checking, and manuscript drafting. Claude Fable 5 subsequently performed independent algebraic audits and supplied editorial comments. Christopher Long checked the mathematics and assumes responsibility for the final paper.
Verification
Unreviewed. A preprint with no peer review and no proof-assistant verification. What it does have is unusual for the tier: every Poisson identity is verified directly in the paper, there is an exact symbolic audit of the polynomial identities, and the noninjectivity is exhibited as a fiber of exactly three explicit points. All of that is four polynomials in four variables, so any reader with a computer algebra system can check the whole claim in minutes. Claude Fable 5 supplied an independent algebraic audit, which is not independent human expert review. Nobody has done that on the record.
Sources
- PaperarXiv
- WikipediaDixmier conjecture
Submitted by VibeGene on