VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

The asymptotically anti-de Sitter Penrose inequality for three-dimensional initial data with spherical conformal infinity

With cosmological constant −3-3, the Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter relation M=(rh+rh3)/2M=(r_h+r_h^3)/2 and Penrose's 1973 argument suggest that asymptotically hyperbolic initial data with a trapped boundary of area AA have mass, in the sense of Wang and Chrusciel-Herzlich, at least 12(rA+rA3)\frac12(r_A+r_A^3) with rA=A/4πr_A=\sqrt{A/4\pi}. Even the time-symmetric case was known only for special classes: graphs (Dahl-Gicquaud-Sakovich, de Lima-Girao), small perturbations of Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter (Ambrozio; Khuri-Kopinski), and Neves showed inverse mean curvature flow cannot be used directly. Does every three-dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter initial-data set with spherical conformal infinity, the dominant energy condition and a weakly trapped boundary satisfy m≥12(rA+rA3)m\ge\frac12(r_A+r_A^3) with AA the minimal enclosing area, with equality only for Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Mathematical general relativity
Posed by
Penrose's 1973 heuristic in the asymptotically anti-de Sitter setting; studied as a conjecture by Dahl, Gicquaud and Sakovich, Ambrozio, and Khuri and Kopinski, among others
Year posed
—
Years open
—
Solved
2026-10-05
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
40 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem 1.1 (principal): under those hypotheses mAH≥12(rA+rA3)m_{AH}\ge\frac12(r_A+r_A^3) with AA the full enclosing-area infimum, sharp; no maximality, compact topology or connectedness assumption. Equality on the stated horizon subclass identifies the original data as a spacelike hypersurface in Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter with the same mass. Companions: the maximal case with possibly disconnected boundary, and a local inequality for small maximal vacuum conformal perturbations of Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter using the horizon's own area. Not shown: higher dimensions, toroidal or higher-genus conformal infinity (the Lee-Neves regime), or timelikeness of the mass as a conclusion.

What the AI did

The release README says the results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model with a fixed procedure, on average about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result, and that some outputs build on earlier model results. This result is not among the README's exceptions (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties and the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region). The manuscripts are authored 'OpenAI' and name no human author. The family has thirteen manuscripts (September 27 and October 5, 2026); the October papers cite the September neutral theorem as an input, consistent with the README's note that some results build on earlier model results.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the abstract, introduction and Theorem 1.1 of the principal manuscript and the two asymptotically hyperbolic companion abstracts were read against the conjecture as the manuscript states it. Not refereed. Scope stated by the paper: dimension three, one spherical asymptotically anti-de Sitter end with stated decay and integrability, compact weakly future outer trapped boundary, and a future-timelike metric mass four-flux, which is assumed rather than derived; equality only on the connected, outermost, outer area-minimizing horizon subclass. The paper says it makes no evolution or cosmic-censorship claim. No Lean formalization.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion