VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Barnette's conjecture

A graph is cubic if every vertex has degree three, and polyhedral if it is planar and 3-vertex-connected, that is, the graph of a convex polyhedron. Tait conjectured that every cubic polyhedral graph is Hamiltonian; Tutte disproved this in 1946. Barnette's conjecture restricts to bipartite graphs. Known before this work: all faces of size 4 or 6 (Goodey), arbitrary faces in one face color class with only quadrilaterals and hexagons in the other two (Feder-Subi), and all faces of size at most 8 (Schnieders, 2025). Does every finite simple cubic bipartite planar 3-vertex-connected graph have a Hamiltonian cycle?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Graph theory: Hamiltonian cycles in planar graphs
Posed by
David Barnette; recorded by Branko Grunbaum as Unsolved Problem 5 in Recent Progress in Combinatorics (Proceedings of the Third Waterloo Conference, May 1968), Academic Press, 1969
Year posed
1969
Years open
57y
Solved
2026-09-24
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
48 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem 1.1: every finite simple cubic bipartite planar 3-vertex-connected graph has a Hamiltonian cycle. In the dual triangulation (Stein; Alt-Payne-Schmidt-Wood) the paper splits the vertices into two induced trees with a prescribed facial pattern, using Tutte states, a signed exponential sum over pairs of states, and gluing along separating triangles. Corollaries: the Hamiltonian cycle can avoid any prescribed edge (a known equivalent strengthening, via Kelmans, Hertel and Gorsky-Steiner-Wiederrecht), and every three-edge path in a cubic 3-connected Pfaffian bipartite graph lies in a Hamiltonian cycle. The result is confined to the bipartite polyhedral class.

What the AI did

The OpenAI math release (github.com/openai/math, commit adc7f12) states that its results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model under one fixed procedure, averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result, across roughly 4,000 posed problems; outputs were then grouped into families and filtered for significance. This result is not among the README's stated exceptions (the Riemann zeta zero-free region work and the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties). The manuscript is credited to OpenAI alone and names no human author.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the abstract, introduction and Theorem 1.1 of the TeX source; the proof was not refereed. Lean: the challenge BarnetteHamiltonian (OAI.Barnette.main, solution module OAI/Combinatorics/Hamiltonian/Main.lean) is not in the release's formalization catalogue, but its JSON and solution file exist at the pinned commit. Statement read here: every finite simple graph that is 3-regular, bipartite, planar (a crossing-free embedding in R2\mathbb R^2 by injective arcs with disjoint interiors) and 3-vertex-connected (at least four vertices, connected after deleting any two) has a Hamiltonian cycle, a single closed walk through every vertex once. That is the headline claim. Permitted axioms: propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choice. Not rebuilt here.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion