VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

The Ford-Konyagin-Luca conjecture: the prime factors of p−1p-1 follow the Poisson-Dirichlet law

For a prime pp, list the prime factors of p−1p-1 with multiplicity in decreasing order q1(p)≥q2(p)≥⋯q_1(p)\ge q_2(p)\ge\cdots and set Vj(p)=log⁡qj(p)/log⁡(p−1)V_j(p)=\log q_j(p)/\log(p-1). For a uniformly random integer the analogous normalized factor sizes converge to the Poisson-Dirichlet law PD(1)\mathrm{PD}(1) (Billingsley, Donnelly-Grimmett). Ford, Konyagin and Luca (2010, Section 6, Conjecture 5) conjectured the same for shifted primes. The first coordinate already contains the shifted-prime Dickman law stated by Granville, #{p≤x:P+(p−1)≤x1/u}∼π(x)ρ(u)\#\{p\le x:P^+(p-1)\le x^{1/u}\}\sim\pi(x)\rho(u) for fixed uu; unconditionally only lower bounds of size x/(log⁡x)Cx/(\log x)^C for P+(p−1)≤x0.2844P^+(p-1)\le x^{0.2844} were known (Baker-Harman, Lichtman), and the full law was known under Elliott-Halberstam (Bharadwaj-Rodgers). With pp uniform among primes up to xx, does (V1(p),V2(p),…)(V_1(p),V_2(p),\ldots) converge in finite-dimensional distributions to PD(1)\mathrm{PD}(1) as x→∞x\to\infty?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Analytic number theory; smooth shifted primes
Posed by
Kevin Ford, Sergei Konyagin and Florian Luca (Prime chains and Pratt trees, GAFA 2010, Section 6, Conjecture 5)
Year posed
2010
Years open
16y
Solved
2026-09-24
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
40 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem 1.1: for every kk and bounded continuous FF on [0,1]k[0,1]^k, the average of F(V1(p),…,Vk(p))F(V_1(p),\ldots,V_k(p)) over primes 3≤p≤x3\le p\le x tends to EF(L1,…,Lk)\mathbb E F(L_1,\ldots,L_k) with (Lj)∼PD(1)(L_j)\sim\mathrm{PD}(1), unconditionally and with equal weight on each prime. The manuscript notes this gives Granville's fixed-uu asymptotic #{p≤x:P+(p−1)≤x1/u}∼π(x)ρ(u)\#\{p\le x:P^+(p-1)\le x^{1/u}\}\sim\pi(x)\rho(u), so a positive proportion of primes have xεx^{\varepsilon}-smooth predecessors for each fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0. No error terms or uniformity as uu grows are claimed. The companion on μ(p−1)=1\mu(p-1)=1 (infinitely many primes with p−1p-1 squarefree with an even number of prime factors) is linked here, not cataloged, since it cites no posing source.

What the AI did

The release README says all results in the release were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model with one fixed procedure, on average about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result. This family is not among the README's exceptions (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties, and the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region whose write-up was human-edited). The manuscripts are authored 'OpenAI' and name no human author. The principal manuscript builds on graph and ideal-kernel estimates proved in the companion 'Weighted dilation graphs, smooth shifted primes and totient fibers' (same date, separate entry for Erdos Problem #821); a third companion (17 September) uses the same machinery for primes with mu(p-1) = 1.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: Theorem 1.1 and the history section were read against Conjecture 5 of Ford-Konyagin-Luca as the manuscript quotes it (same multiplicity convention, normalization and equal weighting of primes). No Lean formalization exists for this family. The claim is unconditional and reaches what was previously known only under the Elliott-Halberstam conjecture; the manuscript says that unconditional distribution results (level one half) cover only part of the simplex and that its extraction argument reaches every compact subset with coordinate sum below one. A claim of this strength should be read as unverified until specialists examine it. It imports estimates from the companion manuscript. Not refereed here.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion