VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Morris's asymptotic conjecture: FC(k,n)=Θk(nk−2)\mathrm{FC}(k,n)=\Theta_k(n^{k-2})

Morris's Conjecture 2 asks whether, for every fixed integer k≥2k\ge2, FC(k,n)=Θk(nk−2)\mathrm{FC}(k,n)=\Theta_k(n^{k-2}) as n→∞n\to\infty. Here FC(k,n)\mathrm{FC}(k,n) is the least mm such that every collection of mm distinct kk-subsets of an nn-point set is Frankl-complete. A configuration G\mathcal G with support U=⋃GU=\bigcup\mathcal G is Frankl-complete if every finite union-closed family F⊇G\mathcal F\supseteq\mathcal G has an element of UU belonging to at least half its sets. The extension may contain additional points.

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI co-developed
Method
Argument
Field
Extremal set theory; union-closed families
Posed by
Robert Morris (2006), “FC-families and improved bounds for Frankl’s conjecture,” European J. Combin. 27, 269–282; Conjecture 2 in arXiv:math/0702348v1.
Year posed
2006
Years open
20y
Solved
2026-09
Model
GPT-6 Astra; Fable 5.1
Vendor
OpenAI; Anthropic
Collaborators
Mingchang Liu
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Preprint
Significance
15 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

It is proved that FC(k,n)=Θk(nk−2)\mathrm{FC}(k,n)=\Theta_k(n^{k-2}) for every fixed k≥2k\ge2, resolving Morris's Conjecture 2. The proof combines robust weighted certificates, pair lifting and extremal forcing with a self-contained lower-bound argument.

For four-sets, n2/4−O(n)≤FC(4,n)≤(18+o(1))n2n^2/4-O(n)\le\mathrm{FC}(4,n)\le(18+o(1))n^2. More generally, for fixed k≥4k\ge4, FC(k,n)≥nk−22(k−2)!−Ok(nk−3)\mathrm{FC}(k,n)\ge\frac{n^{k-2}}{2(k-2)!}-O_k(n^{k-3}).

The sharp FC and robustness thresholds for sunflowers with a two-point core and disjoint pair petals are nine and ten petals. Exact finite certificates establish FC(4,9)=16\mathrm{FC}(4,9)=16 and refute Pulaj and Wood's lexicographic extremality conjecture.

What the AI did

The manuscript's AI statement, in full: "The author and AI models both made substantial mathematical contributions to this work. The finite classification establishing FC(4,9)=16\mathrm{FC}(4,9)=16 was developed primarily by the models. The author proposed extending this work to the four-set case of Morris's conjecture and contributed to proof development and refinement. The collaboration developed the charging inequality, 3:13:1 core-petal weights, and matching negative certificates for the sharp nine-petal sunflower threshold, and combined this local criterion with extremal bounds to prove FC(4,n)=Θ(n2)\mathrm{FC}(4,n)=\Theta(n^2). GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) and Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) contributed to proof exploration, computation, and review. The author takes full responsibility for all mathematical results and the contents of this manuscript." Co-developed on that account: the models carried the finite classification and shared the main argument, the author set the target and takes responsibility.

Verification

Zenodo preprint V1, published 11 September 2026, one author, no independent endorsement. Checked here: the record exists with the abstract as submitted; the manuscript states Morris's Conjecture 2 as the entry does and records that Pulaj settled the three-uniform case exactly (FC(3,n)=⌊n/2⌋+1\mathrm{FC}(3,n)=\lfloor n/2\rfloor+1 for n≥4n\ge 4), so this is the first open uniformity and not a duplicate of anything in the catalog; the companion repository release V1 holds the exact certificates for FC(4,9)=16\mathrm{FC}(4,9)=16 and for the Pulaj-Wood refutation with Python and C++ verifiers. None of the mathematics was checked here and the verifiers were not run. Filed as Candidate, as submitted, until an independent reader has been through the argument or the finite certificates have been replayed.

Sources

Submitted by SilentIbis759 on

Changelog3 changes
  • SilentIbis759changed What was actually shown from “It is proved that $\mathrm{FC}(4,n)=\Theta(n^2)$, settling the four-uniform case of Morris…” to “It is proved that $\mathrm{FC}(k,n)=\Theta_k(n^{k-2})$ for every fixed $k\ge2$, resolving …”, also Statement, Source name, Short name, Name
  • Rasmus Lindahlapproved this entry
  • SilentIbis759submitted this entry

Discussion