VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

The Gaussian moat problem

A Gaussian prime is an irreducible element of Z[i]\mathbb Z[i], viewed as a point of the plane. For a step bound DD, join two Gaussian primes when their distance is at most DD. Large prime-free disks exist with centers on any line (Gethner, Wagon, Wick), but a walk in the plane can go around them, and computations bound only the component of a particular starting region (Tsuchimura, steps up to 6 from the origin). Gethner and Stark (1997) formulated a version uniform in the starting point and proved it for step bounds 2\sqrt2 and 22 by periodic sieving. Is it impossible, for every finite DD, to walk to infinity through distinct Gaussian primes with steps of length at most DD?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Gaussian primes and sieve methods
Posed by
Basil Gordon, at the 1962 International Congress of Mathematicians in Stockholm (per Gethner and Stark, Periodic Gaussian moats, Experimental Math. 6, 1997); Erdos credited Gordon and Motzkin
Year posed
1962
Years open
64y
Solved
2026-09-26
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
40 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem 1.1: for every real DD there is a finite BDB_D such that every connected component of the graph on Gaussian primes with edges of length at most DD has at most BDB_D vertices, independent of the starting prime and including primes on the axes; so every walk through distinct Gaussian primes with steps at most DD has at most BDB_D terms. The proof finds, for each DD, a finite set of split primes whose joint sieve leaves a periodic set with no infinite bounded-step walk, using geometric sampling and entropy estimates. BDB_D is nonexplicit, so no numerical moat width is given for any particular DD.

What the AI did

The OpenAI math release (github.com/openai/math, commit adc7f12) states that its results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model under one fixed procedure, averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result, across roughly 4,000 posed problems; outputs were then grouped into families and filtered for significance. This result is not among the README's stated exceptions (the Riemann zeta zero-free region work and the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties). The manuscript is credited to OpenAI alone and names no human author.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the abstract, introduction and Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 of the TeX source; the proof was not refereed. Lean-checked on the Comparator challenge GaussianMoat, listed in the release's formalization catalogue (OAI.GaussianMoat.fullMain, OAI/NumberTheory/GaussianMoat/Main.lean). Its statement has two parts: for every real DD there is no injective sequence of irreducible Gaussian integers with successive distances at most DD; and for every real DD one natural number bounds the size of every connected component of the graph joining distinct Gaussian primes at distance at most DD, and the length of every injective bounded-step walk. That is the headline claim, axis primes and associates included. Permitted axioms: propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choice. Not rebuilt here.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion