VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Rationality of the Gaitsgory-Lafforgue-Raskin canonical Arthur filtration

For a split connected semisimple group GG over Fq\mathbb F_q and a curve XX, Gaitsgory, Lafforgue and Raskin define a canonical filtration, indexed by nilpotent orbits of the dual Lie algebra, on the space of finitely supported unramified automorphic functions with Q‾ℓ\overline{\mathbb Q}_\ell coefficients, using singular support of ℓ\ell-adic sheaves and the trace of Frobenius. The space of functions has a natural rational form. Their Conjecture 2.7.3, formulated jointly with Kazhdan, asserts that the canonical filtration is defined over Q\mathbb Q. Is the canonical Arthur filtration rational?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Partial result
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Automorphic functions over function fields; geometric Langlands
Posed by
Dennis Gaitsgory, Vincent Lafforgue and Sam Raskin, jointly with David Kazhdan
Year posed
2026
Years open
0y
Solved
2026-09-24
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
22 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Under the stated characteristic assumptions, the canonical Arthur filtration on finitely supported unramified automorphic functions is defined over Q\mathbb Q, for split connected semisimple GG, including the noncuspidal part and every closed invariant nilpotent support. Using the companion decomposition at trivial level, each cuspidal filtration step is identified with the scalar extension of the corresponding rational summands (the common-scope form of GLR Conjectures 3.4.9 and 3.4.11). It does not treat small characteristic or nonsplit groups.

What the AI did

The release README says the vast majority of results, this one included, were produced with one fixed procedure using an unreleased internal OpenAI model, on average about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result, and that some outputs build on earlier model results. This result is not among the README's exceptions (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties and the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region, whose write-up was human-edited). The manuscript is authored 'OpenAI' and names no human author.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the main theorem was read against GLR Conjecture 2.7.3. It is proved for split connected semisimple groups under four explicit characteristic hypotheses (the restricted-theory assumptions), for the whole space including the noncuspidal part; outside those hypotheses the conjecture is not addressed, hence Partial. It uses the restricted geometric Langlands results and trace-of-Frobenius theorems as inputs. The proof was not refereed. No Lean formalization exists for this family.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion