VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

He-Schramm rigidity conjecture: circle domains with conformally removable boundary are rigid

A circle domain Ω⊆C^\Omega\subseteq\hat{\mathbb C} is conformally rigid if every conformal equivalence from Ω\Omega onto another circle domain is the restriction of a Mobius transformation. A compact set EE is conformally removable if every orientation-preserving homeomorphism of the sphere that is conformal off EE is Mobius. He and Schramm proved rigidity for countably connected circle domains and for boundaries of σ\sigma-finite length, and conjectured that a circle domain is rigid if and only if its boundary is conformally removable. Rajala (2025) disproved the rigid-implies-removable direction. Is every circle domain whose boundary is conformally removable conformally rigid?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Partial result
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Geometric function theory; conformal rigidity and removability
Posed by
Zheng-Xu He and Oded Schramm, in their work on rigidity of circle domains (Invent. Math. 1994)
Year posed
1994
Years open
32y
Solved
2026-09-23
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
32 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Claims that every circle domain whose boundary is conformally removable is conformally rigid, with no bound on the number of complementary components and no boundary-extension hypothesis on the map. An intermediate theorem shows that a function continuous across a compact totally disconnected removable set with finite Dirichlet energy off it is globally Sobolev. Together with Rajala's counterexample this settles both directions of the He-Schramm equivalence: removable implies rigid, the converse fails. It does NOT characterize rigid circle domains.

What the AI did

The release README says the manuscripts were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model, the vast majority by one fixed procedure using on average about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result, and that some outputs build on earlier results produced by the models. Its named exceptions to that procedure (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties and the zeta zero-free region work) do not concern this family. The manuscript is credited to OpenAI with no human author named. It uses the quantitative transfer and selection theorem of the companion Koebe manuscript.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Theorem 1.1 was read against the conjecture as the manuscript states it; it proves exactly the removable-implies-rigid direction, the other direction having been disproved by Rajala. The Lean challenge ComparatorChallenges/KoebeCircleDomains.json (solution module OAI.Analysis.CircleDomains.Main, present at the pinned commit) is not in the formalization catalogue formalization.yaml; it was found through lean/docs/071.md. It compares two theorems, OAI.Problem047.koebe_circle_domain and OAI.Problem047.removability_implies_rigidity, with permitted axioms propext, Quot.sound and Classical.choice. The statement was read here; not rebuilt here. removability_implies_rigidity says that for circle domains U and V with conformally removable frontier of U (compact, and every orientation-preserving sphere homeomorphism conformal off it is Mobius), every conformal equivalence f from U onto V agrees on U with a Mobius map. That is the headline claim. The proof depends on the companion Koebe manuscript, also unreviewed.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion