VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Are all complex K3 surfaces Oka manifolds?

A complex manifold XX is Oka if maps from Stein manifolds to XX satisfy the Oka principle; by Forstneric's theorem this is equivalent to the convex approximation property: for every m≥1m\ge1, every holomorphic map to XX from a neighbourhood of a compact convex K⊂CmK\subset\mathbb C^m can be approximated uniformly on KK by holomorphic maps Cm→X\mathbb C^m\to X. Forstneric and Larusson's 2011 survey asked (Section 8, Problem C) whether K3 surfaces are Oka. Known before this work: elliptic and Kummer K3 surfaces are dominable by C2\mathbb C^2 (Buzzard-Lu), Kummer surfaces are strongly dominable, Kummer and elliptic K3 surfaces are Oka-1 (Alarcon-Forstneric), the Kobayashi pseudodistance vanishes on every K3 surface (Kamenova-Lu-Verbitsky), and Xie-Zhao proved that smooth (2,2,2)(2,2,2) hypersurfaces in (P1)3(\mathbb P^1)^3 are Oka and that Oka K3 periods are dense, conjecturing that all K3 surfaces are Oka. Is every complex K3 surface, projective or not, an Oka manifold?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Complex geometry: Oka theory and holomorphic flexibility
Posed by
F. Forstneric and F. Larusson, Survey of Oka theory, New York J. Math. 17a (2011), Section 8, Problem C; conjectured explicitly by S.-Y. Xie and S. Zhao (arXiv:2608.24392, 2026)
Year posed
2011
Years open
15y
Solved
2026-09-23
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
28 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem 1.1: for every complex K3 surface XX, every m≥1m\ge1, every compact convex K⊂CmK\subset\mathbb C^m and every holomorphic ff near KK with values in XX, ff is a uniform limit on KK of entire maps Cm→X\mathbb C^m\to X; hence XX is Oka. Corollaries: dense immersed entire curves with prescribed first jet (Zariski dense if projective, the K3 case of Campana's prediction); Enriques surfaces and hence all minimal compact complex surfaces of Kodaira dimension zero are Oka; and, using the companion global-spherical-shell paper, a minimal class VII surface is Oka exactly when it is Hopf or Enoki. Not shown: the Oka property for other surfaces of non-negative Kodaira dimension, or for higher-dimensional hyperkahler manifolds.

What the AI did

The OpenAI math release (github.com/openai/math, commit adc7f12) states that its results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model under one fixed procedure, averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result. This result is not among the README's stated exceptions (the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region write-up and the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties). The manuscript is credited to OpenAI alone and names no human author.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the abstract, introduction and Theorem 1.1 of the TeX source against Problem C of the Forstneric-Larusson survey and the Xie-Zhao conjecture; the theorem states the convex approximation property in every source dimension for every complex K3 surface, including nonprojective ones, which is equivalent to Oka by Forstneric's theorem. The proof was not refereed. It uses Chen-Gounelas genus-one curve families, the Xie-Zhao period framework and Verbitsky's corrected orbit alternatives. The further classification of class VII surfaces in Section 9 depends on the companion release paper on global spherical shells (itself unreviewed), but the K3 theorem does not. No Lean formalization is supplied for this family.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion