VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

The Kannan-Tetali-Vempala conjecture for simple undirected graphs

For a graphical degree vector d=(d1,…,dn)d=(d_1,\dots,d_n), let Ωd\Omega_d be the simple undirected graphs on {1,…,n}\{1,\dots,n\} with degrees dd. The switch chain removes two disjoint edges and inserts a different perfect matching on their four endpoints when both new edges are absent. Kannan, Tetali and Vempala began this program for bipartite graphs and suggested broad applicability; rapid mixing was then proved for regular sequences (Cooper-Dyer-Greenhill) and for P-stable families, and the bipartite case was settled in 2026. The modern form of the conjecture (Erdos, Greenhill, Mezei, Miklos, Soltesz and Soukup, Conjecture 1.1) asks for rapid mixing for every realizable degree sequence in the bipartite, directed and simple undirected models. Does the switch chain on Ωd\Omega_d mix in time polynomial in nn for every graphical dd?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Markov chain mixing time; sampling graphs with given degrees
Posed by
Ravi Kannan, Prasad Tetali and Santosh Vempala (SODA 1997, RSA 1999); undirected form as Conjecture 1.1 of Erdos, Greenhill, Mezei, Miklos, Soltesz and Soukup (2022)
Year posed
1997
Years open
29y
Solved
2026-09-25
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
30 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Claims Theorem 1.1: for every n≥4n\ge4 and every graphical labeled degree vector dd, the lazy switch chain has total-variation mixing time at most 2n82n^8 and, if ∣Ωd∣>1|\Omega_d|>1, spectral gap at least [24n2(n4)]−1[24n^2\binom n4]^{-1}. Corollary: an exactly uniform sampler for any graphical dd with expected polynomial bit running time, terminating almost surely. This settles the simple undirected formulation; the bipartite formulation was proved earlier by Fu, Qin and Wang (listed separately), and the directed formulation is not addressed. The exponent 8 is not claimed to be sharp.

What the AI did

Produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model as part of an OpenAI evaluation on open research problems. The release README says the vast majority of results used one fixed procedure, averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result; this result is not among the README's stated exceptions (the Riemann zeta zero-free region work and the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties). The manuscript is authored as OpenAI with no human author named.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: abstract, introduction, Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2, read against the conjecture as cited. The proof was not refereed; it adapts the Fu-Qin-Wang variance inequality from the bipartite case. Lean-checked on the release's own Comparator challenge SwitchChain together with its solution module OAI.Probability.SwitchChain.Main, both fetched at the pinned commit; the challenge is not listed in the release's formalization catalogue (lean/formalization.yaml), the statement was read here but not independently audited, and the development was not rebuilt here. The formal statements (OAI.Problem315.switch_chain_main, switch_chain_tv_bound, switch_connectivity) define the lazy kernel exactly as in the paper (holding probability 1/2, a uniform four-set and one of six ordered matching pairs) and state, for n >= 4 and every graphical d, mixing time at distance 1/4 at most 2 n^8, spectral gap at least 1/(24 n^2 C(n,4)) when there is more than one state, and switch connectivity. That is the headline claim. The exact uniform sampler (Corollary 1.2) is not formalized.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion