VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Kaplansky's zero-divisor conjecture

For a group GG and a field KK, the group algebra K[G]K[G] consists of finite formal sums of elements of GG. If g∈Gg\in G has finite order m>1m>1 then (1−g)(1+g+⋯+gm−1)=0(1-g)(1+g+\cdots+g^{m-1})=0, so torsion forces zero divisors. The domain conclusion is known for unique-product groups, torsion-free elementary amenable groups and several geometric classes. Kaplansky's zero-divisor conjecture asserts the converse. If GG is torsion-free and KK is a field, is K[G]K[G] free of nonzero zero divisors?

Result
Disproved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Construction
Field
Group rings and geometric group theory
Posed by
Graham Higman (1940 thesis) and Irving Kaplansky (1956 conference, published 1957, Problem 6)
Year posed
1940
Years open
86y
Solved
2026-09-23
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
62 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Claims a counterexample: a finitely presented torsion-free group GG with a finite two-dimensional classifying space and nonzero α,β∈F2[G]\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb F_2[G] with αβ=0\alpha\beta=0. The group is the fundamental group of a cone complex over two random labelled graphs, with cancellation forced by odd label intersections; torsion-freeness comes from asphericity. It works in characteristic two only and does not disprove the zero-divisor conjecture over Q\mathbb Q or C\mathbb C, nor the Atiyah conjecture.

What the AI did

The OpenAI math release (github.com/openai/math) states that its results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model, with on average about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result, under one fixed procedure applied to roughly 4,000 posed problems; outputs were then grouped into families and filtered for significance. The manuscript is credited to OpenAI alone and names no human author. The release includes a Lean 4 formalization of the main theorem.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: Theorem 1.1 of the TeX source against the posed problem, and the Lean statement. formalization.yaml lists OAI.TorsionFreeZeroDivisors.main (file lean/OAI/Algebra/GroupRing/Main.lean, comparator ComparatorChallenges/TorsionFreeZeroDivisors.json, axioms propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choice). The comparator statement asserts a group GG that is finitely presented, torsion-free in the ordinary sense, has a finite connected 2-dimensional CW complex with contractible covering as K(G,1)K(G,1), and has nonzero α,β\alpha,\beta in MonoidAlgebra (ZMod 2) G with αβ=0\alpha\beta=0. That is the full headline claim. Not rebuilt here; the comparator run was not reproduced.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion