VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Letrouit's square-root stability conjecture for Brenier maps from a uniform convex source

Let ρ\rho be the uniform probability measure on a compact convex body K⊂RdK\subset\mathbb R^d, d≥2d\ge2, and for a probability measure μ\mu on a fixed compact set YY let TμT_\mu be the quadratic optimal (Brenier) map pushing ρ\rho to μ\mu. Known target-uniform bounds had exponents such as W11/6W_1^{1/6} (Delalande-Merigot) and W12/15W_1^{2/15}; Letrouit showed exponents above 1/31/3 fail for some nonconvex sources and conjectured that for a uniform convex source ∥Tμ−Tν∥L2(ρ)≤C W2(μ,ν)1/2\|T_\mu-T_\nu\|_{L^2(\rho)}\le C\,W_2(\mu,\nu)^{1/2} uniformly over targets supported in YY. Is this square-root estimate true?

Result
Disproved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Construction
Field
Optimal transport; quantitative stability
Posed by
Cyril Letrouit (Unstable optimal transport maps, Conjecture 3)
Year posed
2025
Years open
1y
Solved
2026-09-25
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
12 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem 1.1: for KK compact convex with interior in Rd\mathbb R^d, d≥2d\ge2, and YY compact, ∥Tμ−Tν∥L2(ρ)≤C(K,Y)W2(μ,ν)1/3\|T_\mu-T_\nu\|_{L^2(\rho)}\le C(K,Y)W_2(\mu,\nu)^{1/3} for all probability measures μ,ν\mu,\nu on YY, atomic or not; the exponent 1/31/3 cannot be raised even for K=Y=[−1,1]dK=Y=[-1,1]^d and three-atom targets, so Letrouit's square-root conjecture is false and 1/31/3 is the sharp uniform exponent. Not shown: sharp exponents in W1W_1 (a sharp W11/4W_1^{1/4} bound is attributed to Merigot) or for nonuniform source densities.

What the AI did

The release README says the results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model with a fixed procedure, on average about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result. This result is not among the README's exceptions (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties, and the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region whose write-up was human-edited). The manuscripts are authored 'OpenAI' and name no human author. Single manuscript dated September 25, 2026.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: introduction and Theorem 1.1 read against Letrouit's Conjecture 3 as the manuscript cites it. Lean: the challenge lean/ComparatorChallenges/Brenier.json (solution_module OAI.Analysis.Brenier.Stability, present at the pinned commit) is not in the formalization catalogue lean/formalization.yaml. The statements one_third_stability and one_third_exponent_is_sharp were read here: a uniform constant for W21/3W_2^{1/3} stability of unique quadratic optimal maps from the uniform measure on any compact convex body with interior, d≥2d\ge2, and, for every exponent above 1/31/3 and every constant, two three-atom targets on the cube violating the bound. The second disproves the conjecture; both state the headline. Not rebuilt here.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion