The one-dimensional Lieb-Thirring conjecture for
For the Lieb-Thirring inequality reads . The sharp constant is the semiclassical one for (Lieb-Thirring, Aizenman-Lieb) and equals at (Hundertmark-Lieb-Thomas). For , Lieb and Thirring conjectured that the optimal constant equals the one-bound-state constant , the best constant when only the lowest eigenvalue is counted. Is for every ?
- Result
- Proved(see note)
- Status
- Candidate (review pending)
- AI contribution
- AI-discovered
- Method
- Argument
- Field
- Spectral theory; sharp Lieb-Thirring constants
- Posed by
- Elliott H. Lieb and Walter E. Thirring (1976)
- Year posed
- 1976
- Years open
- 50y
- Solved
- 2026-09-23
- Model
- Unreleased internal OpenAI model
- Vendor
- OpenAI
- Collaborators
- —
- Verification
- Lean-checked, statement unaudited
- Publication
- Announced
- Collection
- OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
- Significance
- 36 / 100
- Disclosed cost
- —
- Wikipedia
- No dedicated article
What was actually shown
Theorem 1.1: for every and , ; the constant equals and is attained by , . Companions extend the same constant to Hermitian matrix potentials of any finite size (noncommuting, any rank) and classify all equality cases as direct sums of scalar solitons and zero channels. The scalar paper does not classify optimizers, and nothing is claimed in dimensions above one.
What the AI did
The release README says all results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model using one fixed procedure, about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result on average. This result is not among the README's exceptions (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties, and the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region whose write-up was human-edited). All three manuscripts are authored 'OpenAI' and name no human author. The matrix-potential paper and the equality-case paper (both dated 2026-10-05) build on the scalar paper's action and continuation framework.
Verification
No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the introduction and Theorem 1.1 of the scalar paper were read against the conjecture. formalization.yaml lists ComparatorChallenges/LiebThirring.json with declaration OAI.SharpLiebThirring.sharp_lieb_thirring (file OAI/Analysis/LiebThirring/Main.lean, present at the pinned commit). The statement was read here: for every 1/2 < gamma < 3/2 and every a.e. nonnegative W in L^(gamma+1/2), the supremum over finite orthonormal families of weak negative-energy eigenfunctions of the sum of k_i^(2 gamma) is at most the explicit constant times the potential integral; the optimal constant and the one-bound-state constant both equal that value; and the sech^2 potential attains it. This is the headline claim. Not rebuilt here. The matrix-potential and equality-case companions are not formalized.
Sources
- PaperCompanion: Sharp one-dimensional Lieb-Thirring inequalities for matrix potentialsCompanion: Equality cases in the sharp one-dimensional matrix Lieb-Thirring inequality
- Lean proofLean proof (OAI.SharpLiebThirring.sharp_lieb_thirring)
- CodeOpenAI math release: Sharp one-dimensional Lieb-Thirring constants