VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

The Linear List Hadwiger Conjecture

Kawarabayashi and Mohar (2007, Conjecture 1.3) proposed a linear relaxation of Hadwiger's conjecture for list colouring: there is an absolute constant CC such that every graph with no KtK_t minor is CtCt-choosable. Degeneracy gives O(tlog⁡t)O(t\sqrt{\log t}); the best list bounds before this work were superlinear (for example Postle's O(t(log⁡log⁡t)6)O(t(\log\log t)^6)), and KtK_t-minor-free graphs can have list chromatic number close to 2t2t, so C=1C=1 is impossible. Even the ordinary-colouring version, χ(G)=O(h(G))\chi(G)=O(h(G)), was open. Is there an absolute constant CC with χℓ(G)≤C h(G)\chi_\ell(G)\le C\,h(G) for every graph GG?

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Graph coloring and graph minors
Posed by
Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi and Bojan Mohar, A relaxed Hadwiger's conjecture for list colorings, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 97 (2007), Conjecture 1.3
Year posed
2007
Years open
19y
Solved
2026-09-23
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
48 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem 1.1: there is an absolute integer C≥1C\ge1 such that every finite nonempty simple graph satisfies χℓ(G)≤C h(G)\chi_\ell(G)\le C\,h(G); Corollary 1.2 gives the ordinary linear Hadwiger bound χ(G)≤C h(G)\chi(G)\le C\,h(G). The constant is not computed or optimised and must be at least 22 by Steiner's examples. The proof shows KtK_t-minor-free graphs on at most t11/10t^{11/10} vertices are LtLt-choosable and then lifts this to all orders through Postle-style separability and a three-district recursion. It does not give CC close to 11 or 22.

What the AI did

Produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model as part of an OpenAI evaluation on open research problems. The release README says the vast majority of results used one fixed procedure, averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result; this result is not among the README's stated exceptions (the Riemann zeta zero-free region work and the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties). The manuscript is authored as OpenAI with no human author named. The README also cautions that unformalized results could have issues.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the abstract, introduction, Theorem 1.1 and the INPUTS.md file, read against Kawarabayashi-Mohar Conjecture 1.3 as cited. The proof was not refereed. INPUTS.md lists three results used without proof: the Reed-Seymour fractional bound, a connectivity-extraction theorem (Delcourt-Postle, credited to Girao-Narayanan) and a terminal-linkage theorem (Delcourt-Postle, after Bollobas-Thomason), plus LP duality. The manuscript is dated 23 September 2026 but cites work posted 1 October 2026, so the text was revised after its date. Lean-checked on the release's own Comparator challenge ListHadwiger (OAI.LinearListHadwiger.main_theorem) together with its solution module, both present at the pinned commit; the challenge is not listed in the release's formalization catalogue, the statement was read here but not independently audited, and the development was not rebuilt here.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion