VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Local smooth isometric immersion of surfaces in three-space

Given a smooth Riemannian metric gg on a surface, can a neighbourhood of each point be realised as a smooth surface in R3\mathbb R^3, i.e. is there a smooth FF with ⟨∂iF,∂jF⟩=gij\langle\partial_iF,\partial_jF\rangle=g_{ij} near the point? The analytic case is the Janet-Cartan theorem (1926 to 1927); smooth local existence holds where the Gaussian curvature is nonzero, and Lin, Nakamura-Maeda, Han-Khuri and others treated nonnegative curvature and various degenerate zero sets. Nash-Kuiper gives C1C^1 realisations, and Pogorelov and Nadirashvili-Yuan gave C2,1C^{2,1} metrics with no C2C^2 realisation. Does every smooth surface metric admit a smooth local isometric immersion into R3\mathbb R^3?

Result
Disproved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Construction
Field
Differential geometry, isometric embedding
Posed by
Discussed by S.-T. Yau, Review of geometry and analysis (Asian J. Math., 2000, p. 236), and stated as Problem 1.9 in M. Ghomi, Open problems in geometry of curves and surfaces (2019)
Year posed
2000
Years open
26y
Solved
2026-09-24
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
45 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem A: there is a C∞C^\infty positive definite metric gg on (−1,1)2(-1,1)^2 such that no open neighbourhood of the origin admits a C∞C^\infty isometric immersion into R3\mathbb R^3; the metric can have the full Taylor jet of the Euclidean metric at the origin, so local realisability is not decided by the jet. The curvature takes both signs. Not settled: the smooth local problem under K≥0K\ge0 or K≤0K\le0, finite-regularity versions, and realisation in R4\mathbb R^4.

What the AI did

Produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model as part of an OpenAI evaluation on open research problems. The release README says the vast majority of results used one fixed procedure, averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result; this family is not among the README's stated exceptions (the Riemann zeta zero-free region work and the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties). The manuscripts are authored as OpenAI with no human author named. The README also cautions that unformalized results could have issues. The main theorem has a Lean formalization in the release.

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the abstract and Theorem A of 'A Smooth Metric with No Local Isometric Immersion into Three-Space', read against the problem as quoted from Yau and Ghomi. The proof (a Darboux-equation obstruction on caps, an oscillating perturbation, Baire category and the Nadirashvili-Yuan boundary-saddle argument) was not refereed. Lean: formalization.yaml lists OAI.SmoothLocal.Geometry.exists_local_metric_without_local_immersion (lean/OAI/Geometry/IsometricImmersion/Main.lean, comparator ComparatorChallenges/IsometricImmersion.lean). Its statement was read: a smooth positive-definite matrix field g on the open square (-1,1)^2 such that for every open U inside the square containing 0, no smooth F : U -> R^3 has inner products of its derivatives equal to g. That is the headline. Not rebuilt here. A reader should know that a 2002 arXiv preprint of Nadirashvili and Yuan stated a stronger counterexample, which their 2008 paper and later accounts treat as leaving the question open; the manuscript notes this.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion