VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

McKean Entropy-Production Conjecture

In 1966, McKean asked whether the entropy production of the Boltzmann equation must be monotone decreasing in time. We show that this is not the case even in the space-homogeneous setting for the Boltzmann collision operator with a constant angular cross section and the kinetic parameter γ[0,1]\gamma\in[0,1]. This recovers the classical case of hard spheres and the simplest case of Maxwell molecules. Our examples are radially symmetric mixtures of Maxwellians.

Result
Disproved(see note)
Status
Resolved
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Construction
Field
Mathematical physics
Posed by
Henry P. McKean Jr.
Year posed
1966
Years open
60y
Solved
2026-09-01
Model
GPT-5.6 Sol; Claude
Vendor
OpenAI; Anthropic
Collaborators
Luis Silvestre
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Preprint
Significance
20 / 100
Disclosed cost
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

For the space-homogeneous Boltzmann equation in dimension 33 with collision kernelsB=14πvvγ,γ[0,1],B=\frac{1}{4\pi}|v-v_*|^\gamma,\qquad \gamma\in[0,1],the paper constructs smooth, positive, radial mixtures fR=(1p)M1+pMRf_R=(1-p)M_1+pM_R for which tD(fR)>0\partial_tD(f_R)>0 for sufficiently large RR. Thus entropy production need not decrease even for Maxwell molecules (γ=0\gamma=0) or hard spheres (γ=1\gamma=1), negatively resolving McKean's monotonicity question for these physically standard kernels.

What the AI did

A first version of the proof was obtained by GPT-5.6 Sol running in Codex Ultra with access to Silvestre's earlier paper and research notes. Claude Code then rewrote the initially difficult-to-read proof, after which Silvestre reinterpreted, restructured, and checked the argument and took responsibility for the final proof. The substantive counterexample proof therefore originated from GPT-5.6 Sol under access to author-supplied mathematical context.

Verification

The arXiv preprint contains a complete analytic proof by a leading researcher in kinetic equations, who states that he reinterpreted, restructured, and assumes full responsibility for the final argument. No independent expert review, peer review, or formal proof-assistant verification is currently documented.

Source

Submitted by VibeGene on

Changelog2 changes

Discussion