Modularity of elliptic curves over imaginary quadratic fields
Let be an imaginary quadratic field and an elliptic curve. The Langlands program predicts that is modular: there is an automorphic representation of (a Bianchi modular form when has no complex multiplication) whose Galois representations are , so that . Over this is the theorem of Wiles, Taylor-Wiles and Breuil-Conrad-Diamond-Taylor. Over imaginary quadratic fields, potential modularity was known (Allen et al., 2023), Allen-Khare-Thorne proved modularity for a positive proportion of curves, and Caraiani-Newton for all curves over fields where has rank zero. Is every elliptic curve over every imaginary quadratic field modular?
- Result
- Proved(see note)
- Status
- Candidate (review pending)
- AI contribution
- AI-discovered
- Method
- Argument
- Field
- Langlands program: modularity of elliptic curves
- Posed by
- Robert P. Langlands, Problems in the theory of automorphic forms, LNM 170 (1970), Section 7, as the manuscript cites; studied computationally by Grunewald-Helling-Mennicke and Cremona
- Year posed
- 1970
- Years open
- 56y
- Solved
- 2026-10-04
- Model
- Unreleased internal OpenAI model
- Vendor
- OpenAI
- Collaborators
- —
- Verification
- Unreviewed
- Publication
- Announced
- Collection
- OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
- Significance
- 58 / 100
- Disclosed cost
- —
- Wikipedia
- No dedicated article
What was actually shown
Theorem 1.1: for every imaginary quadratic and every there is an isobaric automorphic representation of with trivial central character and weight zero such that for every and , with local-global compatibility at every finite place and the expected parameter at the complex place; hence . is cuspidal when has no CM. The method is a geometric prime switch: cyclic covers of a quadratic twist of give a chain of mod , mod 3, mod congruences that carries automorphy from an auxiliary curve to through the Caraiani-Newton lifting theorem. It does not treat other CM fields or totally real fields.
What the AI did
The OpenAI math release (github.com/openai/math, commit adc7f12) states that its results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model under one fixed procedure, averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result, across roughly 4,000 posed problems; outputs were then grouped into families and filtered for significance. This result is not among the README's stated exceptions (the Riemann zeta zero-free region work and the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties). The manuscript is credited to OpenAI alone and names no human author. The README also cautions that unformalized results could have issues.
Verification
No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the abstract, introduction and Theorem 1.1 of the TeX source, read against the modularity conjecture for imaginary quadratic fields as the manuscript frames it; the proof was not refereed. The argument uses deep published and preprint inputs as black boxes, above all the Caraiani-Newton lifting theorem and residual-image criterion (arXiv:2301.10509v3, cited as a 2025 preprint) and the potential automorphy work of Allen et al.; the manuscript says Caraiani-Newton remains essential, so the result stands on those inputs as specialized here. The release has no Lean formalization for this family, and the README cautions that unformalized results could have issues.