The polynomial removal conjecture for ordered binary matrices
For a fixed binary matrix , an ordered copy in a binary matrix is a choice of rows and columns with , zeros included. Alon, Ben-Eliezer and Fischer proved qualitative ordered removal: if is -far from -free (at least entry changes needed), it has at least copies. Alon and Ben-Eliezer (Problem 1.4) asked whether can be polynomial, and Gishboliner and Shapira conjectured it for each single . Are there with whenever is -far from -free?
- Result
- Disproved(see note)
- Status
- Candidate (review pending)
- AI contribution
- AI-discovered
- Method
- Construction
- Field
- Extremal combinatorics; property testing
- Posed by
- Noga Alon and Omri Ben-Eliezer (Problem 1.4, 2020); Lior Gishboliner and Asaf Shapira (Conjecture 4.5, 2025); question raised by Alon, Fischer and Newman (2007)
- Year posed
- 2007
- Years open
- 19y
- Solved
- 2026-09-25
- Model
- Unreleased internal OpenAI model
- Vendor
- OpenAI
- Collaborators
- —
- Verification
- Lean-checked, statement unaudited
- Publication
- Announced
- Collection
- OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
- Significance
- 15 / 100
- Disclosed cost
- —
- Wikipedia
- No dedicated article
What was actually shown
Theorem 1.1: there is a fixed binary matrix such that for every , with and , some is -far from -free yet ; hence no polynomial removal bound holds for this , and the finite-family question fails for one square pattern. Corollary: canonical row-column sampling testers need samples along this sequence. Not shown: which patterns do admit polynomial removal, or a counterexample smaller than .
What the AI did
The release README says every result was produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model with a fixed procedure of roughly three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result. This family is not among the README's exceptions (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties, and the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region, whose write-up was human-edited). The manuscripts are authored 'OpenAI' and name no human author. The family is a single manuscript dated September 25, 2026.
Verification
No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the introduction and Theorem 1.1 were read against the conjecture as the manuscript quotes it. Lean: formalization.yaml lists ComparatorChallenges/MatrixRemoval.json, declaration OAI.Problem348.no_polynomial_removal_bound in OAI/Combinatorics/MatrixRemoval/Main.lean. The challenge statement was read: for one explicitly defined 66x66 Boolean matrix and all c, C > 0, there are n, 0 < eps < 1 and an n x n binary matrix whose normalized edit distance to H-freeness (edits in both directions) is at least eps and whose ordered-copy count is below c eps^C n^132. That is the headline claim. Not rebuilt here.
Sources
- Lean proofLean challenge statement: MatrixRemoval.leanLean solution module: OAI/Combinatorics/MatrixRemoval/Main.lean
- CodeOpenAI math release: Polynomial removal fails for ordered binary matrices
- Problem recordAlon-Ben-Eliezer, Efficient removal lemmas for matrices (Problem 1.4)Gishboliner-Shapira, Polynomial property testing (Conjecture 4.5 in arXiv v1)