VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Popa's logarithmic additivity conjecture for log-smooth families

For smooth families, subadditivity of Kodaira dimension is expected to become equality. Popa (Conjecture 3.9 of Conjectures on the Kodaira dimension) asked: let f:X→Yf:X\to Y be an algebraic fibre space between smooth projective varieties, EE an SNC divisor on XX and DD an SNC divisor on YY with Supp(f∗D)⊆E\mathrm{Supp}(f^*D)\subseteq E, and assume ff is log-smooth over V=Y∖DV=Y\setminus D (each stratum of (X,E)(X,E), including XX, is smooth over VV). For a general fibre FF over VV, is κ(X,KX+E)=κ(Y,KY+D)+κ(F,KF+EF)\kappa(X,K_X+E)=\kappa(Y,K_Y+D)+\kappa(F,K_F+E_F)? It generalises his Conjecture 3.1 for smooth projective fibre spaces U→VU\to V of quasi-projective varieties, known when the base is of log general type, a curve, or compactifies to an abelian variety, or when FF has semiample canonical bundle.

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Candidate (review pending)
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Birational geometry, Kodaira dimension of smooth families
Posed by
Mihnea Popa, Conjectures on the Kodaira dimension, Conjecture 3.9 and footnote 5 (author version 13 June 2023; LMS Lecture Note Series 489, 2025)
Year posed
2023
Years open
3y
Solved
2026-09-26
Model
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Announced
Collection
OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
Significance
35 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Theorem 1.1: under Popa's hypotheses (reduced SNC EE, DD, support inclusion, stratum smoothness over VV), κ(X,KX+E)≤κ(Y,KY+D)+κ(F,KF+EF)\kappa(X,K_X+E)\le\kappa(Y,K_Y+D)+\kappa(F,K_F+E_F), and if either term on the right is −∞-\infty every H0(X,m(KX+E))H^0(X,m(K_X+E)) vanishes; no abundance or good-model hypothesis. With the family's logarithmic subadditivity this gives equality, Corollary 1.2. Either divisor may be zero, which covers additivity for smooth projective morphisms; the paper itself claims only Conjecture 3.9. Not covered: families that are not log-smooth over the open base.

What the AI did

Produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model as part of an OpenAI evaluation on open research problems. The release README says the vast majority of results used one fixed procedure, averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result; this family is not among the README's stated exceptions (the Riemann zeta zero-free region work and the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties). The manuscripts are authored as OpenAI with no human author named. The README also cautions that unformalized results could have issues. The upper inequality is proved independently; the equality uses the logarithmic subadditivity corollary of the family's orbifold paper. Only the negative-fibre branch is formalized in Lean (see the verification note).

Verification

No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2 of 'The reverse logarithmic Kodaira inequality and additivity', read against Popa's Conjecture 3.9 and footnote 5 in his 13 June 2023 author version (fetched and read here); the hypotheses match. The proof was not refereed. Lean: lean/ComparatorChallenges/LogKodairaFiberNegative.json exists with solution_module OAI.AlgebraicGeometry.LogKodaira.FiberNegative (present at the pinned commit) but the challenge is not in the formalization catalogue. Its statement was read: for a very general base point, if the fibre's log Kodaira dimension is -infinity then the total one is -infinity and every positive-degree log pluriform vanishes. That is only the elementary negative-fibre branch, not the headline, so the entry is Unreviewed rather than Lean-checked. Not rebuilt here. The equality depends on the family's unreviewed subadditivity paper.

Sources

Changelog1 change

Discussion