Purdy's Inequality for Hyperplane Arrangements
For an arrangement of hyperplanes in with intersection lines and intersection points where at least three hyperplanes meet, the refined form of Purdy's inequality expects . An explicit arrangement built from roots of unity violates it.
- Result
- Disproved(see note)
- Status
- Resolved
- AI contribution
- AI-assisted
- Method
- Computation
- Field
- Discrete geometry
- Posed by
- George Purdy
- Year posed
- —
- Years open
- —
- Solved
- 2026-07-09
- Model
- ChatGPT
- Vendor
- OpenAI
- Collaborators
- Mateusz Michalek, Piotr Pokora
- Verification
- Site-confirmed
- Publication
- Preprint
- Significance
- 15 / 100
- Disclosed cost
- —
- Wikipedia
- No dedicated article
What was actually shown
the refined form for essential arrangements in projective three-space
What the AI did
The acknowledgement credits the model with generating the computer programs used to carry out the symbolic computations over configurations of points and planes, which is how the violating arrangement was checked.
Verification
The counterexample is an explicit root-of-unity arrangement whose point, line and plane counts the paper works out in closed form, so the violation is a finite check. arXiv preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.
Source
arXiv:2607.08463 - A counterexample to Purdy's inequality for hyperplane arrangements