VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

The Simonovits Product Conjecture

Simonovits conjectured that if a forbidden family F\mathcal{F} with p(F)>1p(\mathcal{F}) > 1 has extremal number exceeding the Turan bound by a superlinear surplus, then its extremal graphs are joins of pp graphs, each extremal for a family of chromatic number two. Disproved by a fixed finite family L\mathcal{L} with p(L)=2p(\mathcal{L}) = 2 and ex(n,L)>t2(n)+cn3/2\mathrm{ex}(n,\mathcal{L}) > t_2(n) + cn^{3/2} that nevertheless has, at every large order, an extremal graph with connected complement and hence no nontrivial join decomposition. The same construction disproves the Weak Product Conjecture of Furedi and Simonovits.

Result
Disproved(see note)
Status
Resolved
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Construction
Field
Extremal graph theory
Posed by
Miklos Simonovits, Zoltán Füredi
Year posed
2013
Years open
13y
Solved
2026-08-03
Model
GPT-5.6 Sol
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
Chuandong Xu
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Preprint
Significance
18 / 100
Disclosed cost
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

One construction disproves both the product conjecture and its no-forst form, but not the weak form of the conjecture.

What the AI did

The paper's comment credits the counterexample to GPT-5.6 Sol, found during a Codex project devoted to the Product Conjecture. The exact extremal-number and equality-case analysis around it is the author's.

Verification

Single-author arXiv preprint; not yet peer-reviewed. Lean formalization released but not audited by any third party.

Sources

Submitted by Curator34 on

Changelog1 change
  • Matarisvanset More links to lean-proof: Github repo of the counterexample | https://github.com/Yazum/o6-counterexample…, also What was actually shown, Year posed, Verification note, Posed by, Age footnote, Verification

Discussion