A power saving in the Furstenberg-Sarkozy theorem (square-difference-free sets)
Let be the largest size of a set with no two elements differing by a nonzero perfect square. Answering a question of Lovasz, Furstenberg and Sarkozy proved . Quantitative bounds improved through Pintz-Steiger-Szemeredi and Bloom-Maynard to Green and Sawhney's , while Ruzsa-type constructions give . Green and Sawhney asked whether a fixed power saving holds. Is there an absolute with ?
- Result
- Proved(see note)
- Status
- Candidate (review pending)
- AI contribution
- AI-discovered
- Method
- Argument
- Field
- Additive combinatorics; Furstenberg-Sarkozy theorem
- Posed by
- B. Green and M. Sawhney, New bounds for the Furstenberg-Sarkozy theorem (arXiv:2411.17448), Section 1.1; the underlying problem originates with Lovasz
- Year posed
- 2024
- Years open
- 2y
- Solved
- 2026-09-24
- Model
- Unreleased internal OpenAI model
- Vendor
- OpenAI
- Collaborators
- —
- Verification
- Lean-checked, statement unaudited
- Publication
- Announced
- Collection
- OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
- Significance
- 50 / 100
- Disclosed cost
- —
- Wikipedia
- No dedicated article
What was actually shown
Theorem 1.1: absolute , with for every square-difference-free ; consequently the square-difference graph on has chromatic number at least . Companions: for an intersective of degree , a power saving with exponent depending only on ; and for with a unit root modulo every modulus, a power saving for differences at primes. The exponent is tiny and not computed, far from Ruzsa's lower-bound exponent ; the true exponent is not addressed.
What the AI did
Produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model as part of the openai/math release (pinned commit adc7f12). The release README says results were produced by one fixed procedure averaging about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute each; this result is not among the README exceptions (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties and the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region). The manuscript is authored as OpenAI with no human author named. A Lean formalization accompanies it (Comparator challenge SquareDifference).
Verification
No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: abstract, introduction and Theorem 1.1 of the TeX source, read against Green and Sawhney's question as cited. Lean: Comparator challenge SquareDifference, declaration OAI.SquareDifference.power_saving. This challenge is not in lean/formalization.yaml; its JSON config and solution module exist at the pinned commit. Its statement was read here: there exist reals and such that for every every finite set of integers with for all and has . That is exactly the headline. Not rebuilt here. The paper says the exponent is extremely small and not computed. The two 5 October companions (intersective polynomials, prime arguments) are not formalized; the prime-argument one depends on a companion zero-free half-plane theorem for Dirichlet L-functions.
Sources
- PaperPower saving for intersective polynomial differences, exponent depending only on the degree (companion)A Power Saving for Polynomial Differences at Prime Arguments (companion)
- Lean proofLean Comparator challenge SquareDifference (OpenAI math release)
- CodeOpenAI math release: A power saving for square-difference-free sets
- Problem recordGreen and Sawhney, New bounds for the Furstenberg-Sarkozy theorem (arXiv:2411.17448)