VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Two-Copy Distillability of Werner States

Is a Werner state that is not one-copy distillable ever two-copy distillable? The first open rung of the NPT bound-entanglement ladder, open since 2000.

Result
Disproved(see note)
Status
Resolved
AI contribution
AI-assisted
Method
Construction
Field
Entanglement theory
Posed by
—
Year posed
2000
Years open
26y
Solved
2026-07-23
Model
GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6 Sol
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
—
Verification
Unreviewed
Publication
Preprint
Significance
35 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Two-copy distillable if and only if already one-copy distillable.

Four independent papers settled this within five days of each other, and no single one of them is the account of record. Fu, Gao and Park posted first on 23 July (arXiv:2607.21367), followed by Song and Chen on 26 July (arXiv:2607.23416), then on 27 July both Fraser, Huber, Pozsgay and Vona (arXiv:2607.24309) and Bharti, Gajjala and Haug (arXiv:2607.24479). The headline axes here follow the first posting, which is a filing convention and not a claim about who solved it.

Pozsgay has stated publicly that his group had their AI-assisted proof before the first paper appeared. This site cannot verify a private completion date, so that is recorded as his account rather than as a finding. All four are linked below.

What the AI did

The proof by Fu, Gao and Park was AI-assisted and independently verified by the authors.

Verification

Author-verified arXiv preprint. Within days, two further groups posted independent proofs of the same theorem (arXiv:2607.24309, arXiv:2607.24479), which strengthens confidence but none is yet peer-reviewed.

Sources

Changelog3 changes
  • RustyMarten346commented
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged links from “Fu, Gao and Park - A solution to 2-copy distillability of Werner states (23 Jul, first pos…” to “Song and Chen - A partial-trace matrix inequality and Werner-state distillability (26 Jul)…”
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged What was actually shown from “two-copy distillable iff already one-copy distillable” to “Two-copy distillable if and only if already one-copy distillable. Four independent papers…”

Discussion1

RustyMarten34625 Sep 2026, 17:39 UTC

This should probably be listed as "proved", not "disproved". The conjecture in quantum information theory is that these states are bound entangled, which implies that they are two-copy undistillable. This proof makes progress on that conjecture, rather than refuting it.

0