Yau's question on bounded holomorphic functions: does a complete simply connected Kahler manifold with sectional curvature at most carry a nonconstant bounded holomorphic function?
Let be a complete simply connected Kahler manifold of complex dimension at least two whose real sectional curvature satisfies , with no lower curvature bound assumed. A biholomorphism to a bounded domain would give bounded coordinates; the weaker question asks only for one nonconstant bounded holomorphic function. Must admit a nonconstant bounded holomorphic function, that is, is ?
- Result
- Disproved(see note)
- Status
- Candidate (review pending)
- AI contribution
- AI-discovered
- Method
- Construction
- Field
- Kahler geometry; several complex variables
- Posed by
- S.-T. Yau, Problem 38 of his 1982 problem list, as recorded by Damin Wu and S.-T. Yau (2020, p. 103; 2019 survey, Section 3)
- Year posed
- 1982
- Years open
- 44y
- Solved
- 2026-09-25
- Model
- Unreleased internal OpenAI model
- Vendor
- OpenAI
- Collaborators
- —
- Verification
- Unreviewed
- Publication
- Announced
- Collection
- OpenAI math release (October 2026), version adc7f12
- Significance
- 33 / 100
- Disclosed cost
- —
- Wikipedia
- No dedicated article
What was actually shown
Theorem 1.1: for some finite there is a domain , diffeomorphic to , with a complete Kahler metric satisfying and : every bounded holomorphic function is constant, so the Caratheodory pseudometric vanishes. This disproves the universal assertion in the one-sided question, and also answers Wu's 1967 bounded-domain question negatively under its hypotheses. The sectional curvatures are unbounded below, so the question under a two-sided bound remains open; the dimension is large and not made explicit.
What the AI did
The release README says the results were produced by an unreleased internal OpenAI model with one fixed procedure, on average about three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute per result. This result is not among the README's exceptions (the Hodge conjecture for CM abelian varieties and the Re(s) > 11/12 zero-free region, whose write-up was human-edited). The manuscript is authored 'OpenAI' and names no human author. It is the companion of the negatively pinched threefold manuscript of the same date; the release presents them as one family, and they answer different posed questions.
Verification
No independent mathematician has checked this yet. Checked here: the introduction and Theorem 1.1 were read against the one-sided question as Wu and Yau record it. lean/docs/359.md says the formalization covers only the negatively pinched companion and that this one-sided construction is separate, so there is no Lean statement for this entry. The dimension is not specified: it is some sufficiently large fixed finite value. The curvature is unbounded below, so the two-sided bounded-function question is left open, as the paper says.