VibeMathedMath problems solved by AI

Dihedral and cyclic Ramsey numbers of the alternating 3-path

Rdih(P3alt,Kb)=Rcyc(P3alt,Kb)=2b1R_{\mathrm{dih}}(P_3^{\mathrm{alt}}, K_b) = R_{\mathrm{cyc}}(P_3^{\mathrm{alt}}, K_b) = 2b - 1 for all bNb \in \mathbb{N} — the a=3a = 3 slice of Conjecture 4.9 (Damnjanović–Đorđević, arXiv:2607.06817) and Conjecture 4.23 (Bašić–Damnjanović–Stevanović–Stošić, arXiv:2604.16188).

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Resolved
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Permutational Ramsey theory
Posed by
Damnjanović–Đorđević (Conj 4.9); Bašić–Damnjanović–Stevanović–Stošić (Conj 4.23)
Year posed
2026
Years open
0y
Solved
2026-08-12
Model
Claude Fable
Vendor
Anthropic
Collaborators
Verification
Site-confirmed
Publication
Preprint
Significance
5 / 100
Disclosed cost
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

The a = 3 slice is settled outright; the parent conjectures, asserting 1 + (a-1)(b-1) for all a, remain open for every a >= 4, where the upper bound is the hard part.

What the AI did

The model produced the proof (the Dih(3)=Sym(3)\mathrm{Dih}(3) = \mathrm{Sym}(3) collapse, the Chvátal reduction, the cyclic corollary), the Lean 4 formalization, and the Python verification script autonomously. Human direction was limited to initiation and operational supervision.

Verification

Reproduced by this site on 13 August 2026. The Lean development builds clean (exit 0) with the pinned toolchain (lean4 v4.12.0, core only, no Mathlib). Its own #print axioms output shows all five main theorems — theoremB_lowerBound, theoremB_lowerBound_all_groups, lemma2_blockWitness, lemma3_dih3_eq_sym3, noMonoCopy_completeGraph_reduce — depending on exactly propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound. No Lean.ofReduceBool, so no native_decide behind the result; with comments stripped the source has zero sorry, admit, axiom declarations and native_decide, and its 23 decide calls are kernel-reduced. A naive grep contradicts this only because those words appear in the file's own documentation. The Python checker runs as described: Dih(3) has order 6 and equals Sym(3) (against Dih(4) at 8 of 24), lower-bound witnesses are valid for b = 2..8, and b = 3 is settled exhaustively over all 1,024 colourings of K5. The upper bound for general b is not formalized; it cites Chvatal 1977, R(T, K_n) = (|T|-1)(n-1)+1, giving 2b-1 for the three-vertex path — standard, and the arithmetic checks out. Two things unconfirmed: the claimed DRAT-certified SAT recomputation for b = 2..7 has no CNF, certificate or solver log in the ten-file repository; and there is no human peer review, this being a self-submission of AI-produced work reviewed by AI agents inside the producing pipeline.

Sources

Submitted by ZestyWombat854 on

Changelog4 changes
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Short name from R_dih(P₃ᵃˡᵗ, K_b) = 2b−1 to Alternating 3-path Ramsey numbers, also Verification note, Result qualifier, Verification, Status, Significance, Publication
  • Rasmus Lindahlapproved this entry
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Verification note from The lower bound $R \geq 2b-1$ and $\mathrm{Dih}(3) = \mathrm{Sym}(3)$ are machine-verified… to Reproduced by this site on 13 August 2026. The Lean development was compiled here with the…, also Significance note, What was actually shown, Age note
  • ZestyWombat854submitted this entry

Discussion