VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Phelps–Rodriguez Conjecture

Let pp be a complex polynomial of degree n2n\ge2 whose zeros all lie in the closed unit disk. For every zero aa of pp, there is a critical point ζ\zeta satisfying ζa<1|\zeta-a|<1, except when a=1|a|=1 and pp is a nonzero scalar multiple of znanz^n-a^n.

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Resolved
AI contribution
AI co-developed
Method
Argument
Field
Complex analysis
Posed by
Dean Phelps, Rene S. Rodriguez
Year posed
1972
Years open
54y
Solved
2026-08-12
Model
GPT-5.6 Pro, Claude Opus 5
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
Lech Mazur, Terence Tao
Verification
Lean-verified
Publication
Announced
Significance
30 / 100
Disclosed cost
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

Phelps-Rodriguez implies Sendov, so this entry records the stronger of the pair; the companion Sendov entry records the weaker statement and Mazur's original formalization, which proved Sendov but never stated the equality classification. The exceptional family is genuinely attained rather than an artefact of the proof: for p = z^n - 1 and a = 1 the only critical point is the origin, at distance exactly 1. Both conjectures fell out of one argument, and the strict form was not the announced target - Tao's digestion of Mazur's proof turned out to establish it, which is how a 1972 conjecture was resolved as a by-product of resolving a 1959 one.

What the AI did

Two models in two roles. The underlying mathematics is Lech Mazur's AI-generated proof of Sendov's conjecture, where GPT-5.6 Pro carried the discovery and derivation. Terence Tao then digested and streamlined that argument - by his own account with heavy AI assistance - and observed that it establishes the stronger strict-interior form, which with the boundary classification is Phelps-Rodriguez. The formalization is a separate artifact: Tao's repository states that essentially all of its Lean source was written by Claude Opus 5 under his direction and review. So the model produced the core argument and wrote the formal proof, while the essential step specific to this entry - recognising that the streamlined argument gives the strict form, and supplying the exceptional family - is Tao's, inside a human-led write-up. That is the co-developed tier rather than the assisted one the submission chose: the models did mathematics here, not tooling.

Verification

Audited here on 13 August 2026, which is what lifts this above the submitter's conservative Lean-checked classification. The gap they identified was that nobody had checked the correspondence between Tao's formal statement and the historical conjecture, so that check was performed. Sendov.phelps_rodriguez in Sendov/Conjecture.lean reads: for n2n \ge 2 and pp of natDegree nn with every root in the closed unit disk and p(a)=0p(a)=0, either some critical point has ζa<1|\zeta - a| < 1, or a=1|a| = 1 and p=c(Xnan)p = c(X^n - a^n) for some nonzero cc. That is exactly Phelps-Rodriguez, exceptional family included, with no weakening; and it is not vacuous, since natDegree =n= n with n2n \ge 2 forces p0p \ne 0, which the proof derives rather than assumes. All 80 first-party files were audited with comments stripped: zero admit, zero axiom declarations, zero native_decide, and 124 decide calls, all kernel-reduced. The only two sorry occurrences sit in Challenge.lean, which nothing imports, so they are outside the proof path. On the build, all four GitHub Actions runs report failure, which is misleading: reading the job steps shows the leanprover/lean-action build succeeded on the latest commit, and the failing step is docgen-action, documentation generation. That makes the kernel check third-party evidenced rather than resting on the author's machine. Not independently reviewed by another mathematician: the repository says so, and Tao both wrote the digestion and directed the formalization.

Sources

Related entries

Submitted by HiddenHawk615 on

Changelog7 changes
  • Rasmus Lindahlset Related entries to same-work -> sendov-s-conjecture (Both fall to Tao's digestion of Mazur's argument: the in…
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Links from 1 link repeating the primary source to removed / shortened to satisfy the link rules
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Verification note from Audited by this site on 13 August 2026, which is what lifts this above the submitter's con… to Audited here on 13 August 2026, which is what lifts this above the submitter's conservativ…
  • Rasmus Lindahlset Significance to 30, also AI contribution, Significance note, Collaborators, What was actually shown, AI role
  • Rasmus Lindahlapproved this entry
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Status from candidate to resolved, also Age note, Verification note, Verification, Model
  • HiddenHawk615submitted this entry

Discussion