VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Sendov's Conjecture

Let pp be a complex polynomial of degree n2n \ge 2 whose zeros all lie in the closed unit disk. Then for every zero aa of pp, there exists a critical point ζ\zeta of pp such that ζa1|\zeta-a| \le 1.

This is the standard Sendov statement and exactly matches the theorem Mazur formalized.

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Resolved
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Complex analysis
Posed by
Blagovest Sendov
Year posed
1959
Years open
67y
Solved
2026-08-05
Model
GPT-5.6 Pro
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
Lech Mazur
Verification
Lean-verified
Publication
Preprint
Significance
40 / 100
Disclosed cost
Wikipedia
4 languages

What was actually shown

Sendov's conjecture is resolved for every degree n >= 2, closing a gap that had stood since 1959: degrees up to eight were settled piecemeal between 1969 and 1999, and Tao's 2020 result covered all sufficiently large degrees without ever specifying the threshold, leaving the middle range open. Tao's digestion establishes the stronger interior form of the statement, which resolves the Phelps-Rodriguez conjecture in full generality as a consequence - a second conjecture falling out of the same argument, and one that likely merits its own entry. Two independent Lean developments now exist: Mazur's original at roughly 90,000 lines and Tao's streamlined version at about 15,000.

What the AI did

GPT-5.6 Pro contributed substantially to the discovery and derivation of the proof, including mathematical exploration, proof development, exact computational testing, and adversarial auditing. Lech Mazur directed the research workflow, selected and reconciled model outputs, and authored the resulting manuscript. A separate Lean 4 development proves the exact statement of Sendov's conjecture.

Verification

Independently verified twice over, and this site audited the formal artifact itself on 13 August 2026. The decisive external check is Terence Tao's post of 12 August 2026, "A digestion of the proof of Sendov's conjecture": he writes that "Lech Mazur was able to use an AI tool to resolve Sendov's conjecture for all n2n \ge 2", reports formalizing the whole argument in Lean himself at about 15,000 lines against the original's roughly 90,000, and concludes that it resolves both the Sendov and Phelps-Rodriguez conjectures in full generality. Tao proved the large-degree case in 2020, so this is expert verification by the person best placed to give it, and it carries the tier. Separately, this site audited Mazur's Lean package. SendovConjecture in Sendov/Statement.lean is exactly the conjecture, correctly quantified and shadowed nowhere. Across all 1,160 first-party files there are zero sorry, zero admit, zero custom axiom declarations and - the one that matters for an autonomous prover - zero native_decide; the 1,117 decide calls are kernel-checked, and the axiom profile is exactly propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound. All 1,160 file hashes match the published evidence record byte for byte. What could not be checked is the build: the bundle ships no lakefile or manifest and excludes Mathlib, so it cannot be recompiled as distributed, a gap ProofAtlas's own evidence file is candid about. This entry rests not on that internal status but on Tao's independent digestion.

Sources

Related entries

Submitted by HiddenHawk615 on

Changelog5 changes
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Verification note from Independently verified twice over, and this site audited the formal artifact itself on 13 … to Independently verified twice over, and this site audited the formal artifact itself on 13 …
  • Rasmus Lindahlset Age note to Sendov described the conjecture to Nikola Obreshkov in 1959, and it was misattributed to L…
  • Rasmus Lindahlapproved this entry
  • Rasmus Lindahlchanged Verification note from Mazur's proof is accompanied by a complete Lean 4 formalization of the exact Sendov statem… to Independently verified twice over, and this site audited the formal artifact itself on 13 …, also Year posed, Wikipedia languages, Significance note, Renown note, Significance, What was actually shown
  • HiddenHawk615submitted this entry

Discussion