VibeMathedMath problems solved with AI

Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734

Let f(n) be the maximum size of a subset of {1,...,n} containing no three distinct a,b,c satisfying 1/a = 1/b + 1/c. A published finite frontier for Erdős problem 302 asks whether f(732) is 606 or 607, using the existing OEIS value f(731)=606.

Result
Proved(see note)
Status
Partial result
AI contribution
AI-discovered
Method
Argument
Field
Extremal sets avoiding distinct reciprocal triples
Posed by
Finite frontier: Erdős Frontier Atlas P302, recorded July 2026. Parent problem: Erdős and Graham (1980); the parent asymptotic problem is not solved.
Year posed
2026
Years open
0y
Solved
2026-09-07
Model
OpenAI ChatGPT/Codex (exact model identifier unavailable)
Vendor
OpenAI
Collaborators
Sodelin (project owner and research direction)
Verification
Lean-checked, statement unaudited
Publication
Announced
Significance
4 / 100
Disclosed cost
—
Wikipedia
No dedicated article

What was actually shown

The Lean development proves f(732)=f(731), f(733)=f(732)+1 and f(734)=f(732)+2. The 732 step replaces an isolated five-vertex component without reducing an admissible set. Exact finite certificates show that neither 733 nor 734 belongs to a forbidden reciprocal triple with vertices at most 734, so each new vertex raises the maximum by one. Conditional on the published OEIS value f(731)=606, the resulting values are f(732)=606, f(733)=607 and f(734)=608. The historical asymptotic Erdős problem remains open. Priority is provisional; the elementary component argument may be folklore.

What the AI did

The assistant selected the 732 finite target, found the isolated-component replacement proof, computed exact witnesses and wrote the Lean formalization. Further assistant work proved the 733 and 734 transfers, added exact 607- and 608-element witnesses, and replaced native-checker finite steps with kernel-checked certificates. Separate assistant instances reviewed arithmetic and formal statements. Sodelin initiated and directed the research. No independent human expert review has occurred.

Verification

Lean 4.33.1 compiles the structural theorems through 734, including domain cardinality and the rational-equation bridge. At the current pinned source commit, the final theorems report only propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound; the earlier bv_decide/native LRAT checker axiom has been removed. Closed finite certificates for the gadget and endpoints are kernel checked without axioms. Independent exact Python verifiers check 606-, 607- and 608-element witnesses and enumerate all 738 forbidden triples through 734. The numerical baseline f(731)=606 is external OEIS data, not a theorem proved here. The formal statement and priority remain unaudited by an independent human expert. This is a partial finite result in a public repository, not peer-reviewed.

Sources

Submitted by ZestyDingo473 on

Changelog3 changes
  • ZestyDingo473changed Short name from “A390395: plateau at 732” to “A390395: finite values through 734”, also Source URL, Source name, What the AI did, Name, Verification note, More links, What was actually shown
  • Rasmus Lindahlapproved this entry
  • ZestyDingo473submitted this entry

Discussion