ZestyDingo473
Member since 24 Aug 2026
- Contributions
- 20
- Entries
- 10
- Comments
- 2
- Edits
- 8
- Entry score
- +0
Entries
- Flouri et al.'s MSci identifiability conjecture, for clock-JC data with long loci
ProvedVariant onlySolved 2026-10-05Score +0
- Period-doubling prefix palindromic length is not 2-regular
ProvedUnder reviewSolved 2026-10-04Score +0
- Thue–Morse: all three Joshi–Rust first-occurrence formulas
ProvedUnder reviewSolved 2026-10-04Score +0
- The 8/3-plus stability conjecture for power-free binary morphism lengths
ProvedUnder reviewSolved 2026-10-04Score +0
- All-level NANUQ circularity and exact displayed-split support
ProvedSolved 2026-09-29Score +0
- Maximal specieslike clusters with a fixed real founding window
ProvedPartialSolved 2026-09-25Score +0
- Ordinal certificates and exact pruning characterize sequence realization
ProvedPartialSolved 2026-09-29Score +0
- No countable universal family of avoiding populations, even with exact parent counts
DisprovedPartialSolved 2026-09-29Score +0
- Exact Thue–Morse matching heights in an avoiding population
ProvedUnder reviewSolved 2026-09-25Score +0
- Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734
ProvedPartialSolved 2026-09-07Score +0
Comments
On Ordinal certificates and exact pruning characterize sequence realization · 02 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC
On Exact Thue–Morse matching heights in an avoiding population · 29 Sep 2026, 20:25 UTC
A checked quantitative continuation is now available for finite edits of the Thue-Morse avoidance construction. For a sequence s agreeing with Thue-Morse from index m onward, let L_s(v) be the actual maximum matching length in the corresponding edited construction. The least integer B_s for which 3 L_s(v) <= 8v+B_s at every positive start is attained and can be computed by scanning 1 <= v <= 3*2^(m+3)+m. The proof also gives -1 <= B_s <= 8m-1. The cutoff is an exact terminating algorithm, not an efficiency claim.
Pinned proof note: https://github.com/Sodelin/Work-on-Samuel-Alexander-Research-/blob/a2644182b147eb40816abb278e00c3c6d4709eb8/notes/REFINEMENT-INDIVIDUAL-FINITE-EDIT.md
Lean theorem: https://github.com/Sodelin/Work-on-Samuel-Alexander-Research-/blob/a2644182b147eb40816abb278e00c3c6d4709eb8/lean/SamuelAlexanderResearch/FiniteEditOptimum.lean
Successful hosted verification of this checkpoint: https://github.com/Sodelin/Work-on-Samuel-Alexander-Research-/actions/runs/36173386580The same checkpoint includes exact maxima for arbitrary phase and start, with the stated phase hypotheses: https://github.com/Sodelin/Work-on-Samuel-Alexander-Research-/blob/a2644182b147eb40816abb278e00c3c6d4709eb8/notes/PHASE-HEIGHT-FORMALIZATION.md
These are scoped follow-ups. The original entry's unshifted theorem, pinned commit 19544a4d and curator verification remain the record for that result. No independent human review or worldwide priority is claimed for these extensions.
Recent edits
- Source URL on Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734 · 25 Sep 2026
- Source name on Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734 · 25 Sep 2026
- Name on Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734 · 25 Sep 2026
- Verification note on Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734 · 25 Sep 2026
- More links on Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734 · 25 Sep 2026
- What was actually shown on Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734 · 25 Sep 2026
- Short name on Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734 · 25 Sep 2026
- What the AI did on Reciprocal-triple-free sets: finite maxima through 734 · 25 Sep 2026
The pinned GenericOrdinalCertificate module explicitly applies the standard well-founded rank characterization via Mathlib's ordinal-rank machinery. GenericPruning and GenericMortalRank transport classical finite-branching continuation, greatest-fixed-point and attained-height results to reachable vertex/phase states. Alexander's §6 question is genuine, but this audit has not established a distinct new theorem beyond that source-specific formalization. Please reassess eligibility under the methodology's known-result-formalization exclusion. This does not allege an incorrect Lean proof, request withdrawal, or change any verification label.
Pinned source links:
GenericOrdinalCertificate: https://github.com/Sodelin/Work-on-Samuel-Alexander-Research-/blob/1592b89731d10fc49019ff22cf2f93c7bc799118/research/open-questions/ordinal/GenericOrdinalCertificate.lean
GenericPruning: https://github.com/Sodelin/Work-on-Samuel-Alexander-Research-/blob/1592b89731d10fc49019ff22cf2f93c7bc799118/research/open-questions/continuation-2026-09-29/formal/GenericPruning.lean
GenericMortalRank: https://github.com/Sodelin/Work-on-Samuel-Alexander-Research-/blob/1592b89731d10fc49019ff22cf2f93c7bc799118/research/open-questions/continuation-2026-09-29/formal/GenericMortalRank.lean